AI Usage in Marketing: 'Disclosure Responsible, Ethical & Expected'
Jordan Kelly • 21 April 2025

AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'

I asked Jamie Munro - my UK-based friend and expert on all matters AI and robotics, and now a regular columnist for The Customer & The Constituent - to comment on the upside, downside, ethics and general state-of-play around the use of AI in this low-price-specialist, youth-targeting New Zealand telco's marketing.


Here's his reply (noting that he's given consideration to explaining some background, for the benefit of my growing international readership):


Skinny is a mobile network provider based in New Zealand that has recently introduced an "AI brand ambassador".


In this case, Skinny has been able to "clone" a real person and use her likeness in a number of AI-generated adverts. Over the last few years, we have witnessed the "deepfake" phenomenon, in which AI technology has been able to generate increasingly realistic images of real people in fictional scenarios.


More recently, AI video generation has improved to the point where a similar thing can be done with videos.


Up until this point, much of the commentary has been focused on the negative impacts of this technology with, for example, reports of nefarious individuals using the technology to generate pornographic images of women without their consent and, by way of another example, manipulate public opinion with realistic but misleading content in the political sphere. 


By contrast, Skinny provides an example of the positive applications of the technology. In its case, Skinny has been able "train" an AI video model to produce realistic video and imagery of the company's "brand ambassador", a customer called Liz. Once the model is trained, the marketing team at Skinny is able to rapidly generate "creative" of Liz in various different scenarios.


Cost Efficiencies Are Considerable


In interviews, Skinny compares the cost of getting the video model set up, to the cost of a traditional marketing campaign, pointing out that they now have the model permanently available, and can create new material quickly and cheaply. They are also able to use AI to rapidly test out a variety of ideas, a process that would be too costly without using AI. They emphasise that responsible and ethical usage of AI should include being very upfront, transparent and clear when dealing with AI-generated content.


In the coming years, businesses who are able to apply AI technology effectively will derive serious advantages over those still stuck in the past. Those willing to embrace the new technology in a thoughtful and responsible way will be rewarded with improved efficiency and productivity.


On the other hand, irresponsible usage of AI can be highly counter-productive.  Consider the potential backlash if Skinny had used their AI brand ambassador without disclosing that she was generated using AI, and this later became public knowledge.


Consumer attitudes towards AI will change over time, and the usage of AI-generated content may eventually become so common that disclosure is unnecessary, but we are certainly not there yet.

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
Woke & Wiggling Around the Truth . . . NZers Turning Their Backs on 'Legacy Media' in Droves
Show More