Out-of-Control, Redneck Cop Hijacked By His Own Adrenalin Rush & His Own Personal Mission . . . Young Girl Dies As A Result
Jordan Kelly • 26 September 2024

With Redneck Fools Like 'Officer A' in the New Zealand Police, We're All A Lot Safer on the Roads, Right? Yeah . . . Tell That to the Dead Girl and Her Whanau.

Stuff media has responsibly allowed this particularly heinous (and fatal) police conduct to be brought to the attention of the public (so many instances of rotten-to-the-core police conduct are never exposed, of course).


The wantonly reckless, speed-freak actions of 'Officer A' - the utter epitome of a Fool in Uniform - took the life of the young and innocent woman depicted in the Stuff news segment . . . and without need, without thought, and, thus far, without any accountability by this redneck whatsoever.


However, a seasoned accident investigator (speaking out independently) has spoken to Stuff, telling them this cretinous individual should be subject to criminal charges. And yet, conversely, within days this dangerous public liability in a police uniform was back behind the wheel of a patrol car. (So he clearly suffered stuff-all guilt or trauma for having just needlessly killed a young woman, eh?)


A Miracle That this Fool-in-Uniform's Criminal Idiocy Didn't Cause Multiple Deaths


What is even more concerning than the life his criminal idiocy claimed, is that - if you view the repro-footage shown by this (let's call him a) whistleblower (i.e. the investigation professional who has bravely spoken out) - it is beyond amazing that multiple other vehicles, their occupants, and pedestrians, were not also taken out . . . by this "officer" hijacked by his own adrenalin rush. 


Why? You have to watch his recreation of the event to believe it. The Fool in Uniform chased this obviously terrified young woman along a single-lane-width road running right beside the waterline the ocean, with no footpath, and with multiple driveways coming down to said road at steep gradients and which were fully shrouded in trees at their roadway entrance.


Could it have been any more of a multi-factorial recipe for multiple fatalities?


Stuff's commentary in this news piece echoes a key point made in its earlier coverage of the "accident" (that, in my view, would be more accurately described as a "killing", since that outcome was clearly inevitable). That is, it demonstrates the fact that - unlike the officer in completely unnecessary and wantonly dangerous pursuit - the young woman, named Angel, was not some fellow criminal, she was simply frightened of the local police due to treatment she had received in an earlier interaction.


Today's Coppers Aren't Like Those We Grew Up Relying On & Trusting (Many Are Now Just Dangerous - and Dangerously Unaccountable - Thugs)


But hey, it's all OK, right? We're in need of more cops, so what's the downside of putting rednecks like this behind the wheel of a patrol car? And, if any outcome should result in any pesky media coverage, the IPCA ("Independent" Police Conduct Authority - which is anything but independent) can "investigate" their own, right? What could possibly be wrong with that "process"?


And if you think the police in New Zealand nowadays couldn't possibly be so different from those we grew up thinking we could rely on and trust, here's my own recent experience of how they have better things to do than investigate crimes (like causing them, as we see here in this fatal outcome and the heinous and unaccountable loss of such a young life).


But Look A Little Deeper . . . & There's the Stink of Collusion & Corruption


In the below earlier Stuff coverage, you'll see how this case might be one involving a whole lot more than just an out-of-control redneck cop.


How so?


That same "officer" had pulled over Angel and her friend at a random breath check stop at some time in the recent past. According to the friend Angel had been with at that earlier time, although there had been no reason for it, the "officer" had - in an act of unwarranted aggression towards the girl - pushed his bloated-out chest into her body. (Readers can hear other details in the below YouTube video of the Stuff news segment.)


In Stuff's earlier coverage, the investigative journalist on the case, uncovered:


- That a witness engaging in a water sport, and watching the pursuit from the water, had seen the pursuing police car (in his words) "right up the ass" of Angel's car.


-  That the family had found black rub marks on the rear bumper bar, that they claim had not been on Angel's vehicle prior, and that indicated clearly that contact had been made.


-  How, some three months after the accident, and with the family doing all it could to bring the case to the attention of the public and achieve transparency, truth and justice from the police (and getting nowhere amidst a stew of conflicting claims from them), the police suddenly "found" a bag of methamphetamine . . . a substance that Angel's mother said she had never engaged in the taking thereof.


So . . . my readers, you decide. Does it sound like a crockpot of corruption on the part of the police? Sure does to me. But, again, never fear. The ultimate crockpot of corruption - the "Independent" Police Conduct Authority will get to the bottom of the whole stinking story.


Yeah, right.

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 21 April 2025
AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
Show More