How to Accept A Compliment
Jordan Kelly • 7 March 2024

When you refuse a compliment, it's like ungratefully handing back a gift.

I remember reading that somewhere, a long time ago. It's true, isn't it? Have you ever offered someone a compliment and they refuse it, ignore it, diffuse it, or downgrade it?


Sometimes it's ignorance and a plain lack of manners and good grace. Sometimes it's bashfulness and an inability to gracefully accept praise.


But - in the case of a shop assistant or other customer-facing operative ignoring a compliment - it's often just complete obliviousness to the person they're "serving".


That was brought home to me when I went into an outlet to find my favorite, increasingly hard-to-get beverage, Schweppes Soda Water in a glass bottle 4-pack. (I've got no idea why supermarkets no longer stock this basic item along with the rest of the Schweppes soft drink range, but they don't.)


I've only found two outlets in the entire Greater Wellington region that still stock this very refreshing beverage - that I have found no acceptable substitute for. One is a bottle store in Tawa, and the other is a bottle store in Masterton.


During one of my most recent purchases of this product, I expressed my gratitude to the shop assistant at the counter, for the fact that they continue to stock it - especially when supermarkets inexplicably no longer do.


Ignorance Does NOT Create Goodwill


The assistant just ignored me - as though I had not spoken. They certainly must have heard me. I was the only one in the store, and they were in front of me scanning the product's bar code at the time.


I repeated the compliment. And they repeated the ignorance.


Unbelievable. I was grateful that I was, in fact, the only one in the store, because I would have been humiliated had anyone else witnessed the very ignorant non-verbal rebuff of my genuine statement of gratitude.


I can't help but feel mildly affronted by this recent rebuff whenever I go to repeat my purchase in this outlet. And it shouldn't be so. I should have a nice, fuzzy feeling about how I not only enjoy the ability to purchase this product, but that the outlet recognises they have a grateful, repeat customer.


What's the moral of the story? I suppose it's this: 


If you're a mature-age store owner or shop assistant, have some basic bloody manners. Why wouldn't you? Someone's offering you a compliment, for goodness' sake.


And if you are a business owner, make sure you school your younger, less mature-minded counter staff in the good grace of how to politely accept a compliment. Even, maybe, thank the shopper who extends themselves to offer the compliment.


Such a small thing, handled correctly, sets the tone for future goodwill. Or, handled ignorantly, leaves the customer embarrassed and not willing to humiliate himself or herself again in your store.


In closing, here's an example of a compliment handled correctly


Today, I was fueling up in the Mobil petrol station in Masterton.


An American tourist had pulled in, in his campervan. He had used the service station's restrooms, and had made a point of coming back to the counter, and complimenting the staff member serving, on the cleanliness of the facilities.


His compliment was recognised, and a return of appreciation for the compliment was offered.


Simple. Both parties felt good. Actually, three parties. Because I witnessed the exchange, and it was a momentary pleasantry that vicariously made me feel good, too.


Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 21 April 2025
AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
Show More