New Zealand Couriers' GM Devon Buckingham, Regarding Your Masterton Operation, Is This the 'Customer Service Satisfaction' You Laud on Your Website?
Jordan Kelly • 23 November 2024

Tell Me, Mr Devon Buckingham, General Manager of New Zealand Couriers . . . Does This Make You Proud? If So, Freightways' Board of Directors Might Want to Think About Asking You to Find A New Position . . . In Another Industry.

(READERS:  PLEASE BE SURE TO READ THROUGH TO THE VERY END OF THIS STORY, AS I'VE SAVED 'THE BEST' FOR LAST.)


So, Mr Buckingham, here are some of the key messages on New Zealand Couriers' public-facing website:


"As our business grows we look for those who can deliver on our promise as they deliver our customers’ packages."


'Owner drivers

"NZC contractors (our couriers) provide the everyday strength, co-ordination and stability with which we drive forward – they’re the backbone of our operation and the face of our brand."


'Is this right for me?

We are looking for people with the following:

  • A positive attitude
  • Reliability
  • Honesty and commitment
  • Customer-focus
  • Attention to detail
  • Good communication skills"


Mr Buckingham, let me ask you if - in your view - the above messaging on your website, is in alignment with my own, continuing, experiences of your company here in Masterton . . . including the loud and very public verbal abuse I received from your courier this morning, which entertained the entire street:


Here's the way in which the woman you have delivering to my part of town believes is totally acceptable to deliver a featherweight box of specialty teas:  Left on the gatepost, at the road, where the next gust of wind can blow it down the street, or anyone could effortlessly whisk it away under their arm while passing:


It should be noted, that my fully-accessible front porch is approximately 10 paces from the letterbox, through an easy-opening gate, and has an easily-opened, large box for receiving courier deliveries . . . as every other courier that delivers here knows, and kindly uses (for both our sakes' convenience).


Since this event, I ask suppliers to avoid using New Zealand Couriers wherever possible (most times they can; some can't). And I also double-ask them to make extremely clear, the Delivery Instructions (which I write or dictate to them) instructing that the delivery be put in the box on the porch.


When A Courier Company Treats Customers with Complete Contempt At Both Ends . . . Sender and Receiver


Sometimes, the nature of the delivery is both time-sensitive and heat-sensitive. Such was an urgent delivery despatched by a vet in Tauranga last week, for my sick little dog.


The veterinary practice staff were endeavoring to see to it that I received these urgent medications for my dog before the weekend, given the urgency of his condition. So, they plastered four giant "URGENT SAME DAY DELIVERY" stickers all over it, and got it away inside the hour, contacting me to tell me it would arrive the next day i.e. Friday.


It didn't. Well, actually, it did. But I didn't find it until Sunday night, when - going down my driveway - I notIced the letterbox (obscured from this side, by a large lavender bush) jutting open and something jutting out. 


You guessed it. It was the "URGENT SAME DAY" package . . . jammed into a letterbox that was clearly too small for it, with the package split open and its contents, including capsules, spilling out. Worse still, these highly heat-sensitive veterinary medications had been baking in a hot, unshaded metal letterbox all weekend.


To be noted, I hadn't moved from the house at any time on Friday or at all during the weekend (up until the Sunday night when I found the package). Two vehicles in the driveway would have clearly indicated to the courier that someone was at home to take receipt of this clearly urgent (as marked by four 'URGENT SAME DAY DELIVERY" stickers) package from a veterinary hospital.


So, on Monday morning, I rang New Zealand Couriers' complaints line. Attempting to explain the background to the complaint, i.e. that it followed earlier unacceptable delivery "standards", the customer "service" operator continually shut me down. She spoke over top of me constantly, and her occasional snigger indicated that she was thoroughly enjoying my frustration.


'We'll Look Into It.' Yeah, Right.


I received the standard email template after that phone call. Paraphrased. "We'll look into it."


Well, it looks like she never bothered. Certainly, she never bothered to even acknowledge my subsequent email, seeking her assistance to ensure the safer, and hopefully undamaged and unspoiled, delivery I was expecting from a medicinal herbalist later in the week:


Hello Mina


I have a parcel being despatched (probably tomorrow) from a medicinal herbalist (as copied in on this email) up in the Far North.


Would you please ensure that the courier doesn't just leave this in my hot metal letterbox at the gate, but leaves it properly in the wooden box on the front porch (where all other couriers leave my packages, or come to the door).


If she just leaves it in the metal letterbox, given the direct sun on it and thus the heat in it, these herbal medicinals will be rendered non-viable.


Thank you in advance for your attention to this important matter.


Regards

Jordan Kelly


This Experience Should Be Enough to Get Any Courier Company's Senior Management 'Re-Assigned' (to Another Industry)


Now let me report to you exactly how effective this plea was (NOT), by way of the following commentary on what took place this morning:


I was eating my breakfast on the patio outside my conservatory, when the NZ Couriers woman stopped, and yet again just leaned over the letterbox, and thrust the below package in there. (Yes, despite the above - ignored - email to the "customer complaints" sheila, whose position, in my view, should be re-advertised.)


I called out to her that that was heat-sensitive material and the delivery instructions to "put it in the box on the porch" need to be followed.


She shrugged and yelled back smart-assedly that she "didn't know what was in" (the package).


I protested:  She didn't need to, she just needed to follow the delivery instructions.


She called back antagonistically and smugly over her shoulder, while continuing to walk back to her van, "ARE there any delivery instructions on the package? Where are they?"  (indicating that she was denying that there were any delivery instructions on the package)

I could readily see that there were indeed clearly written, clearly-sized, and *asterisked* delivery instructions on the package, and I endeavored to hold the package up above the driveway gate to show her . . . which triggered her into a loud and very public volley of insults (remembering, she was out on the street) and a string of what sounded like names and expletives in a language I didn't understand.


I called back from my driveway
(since her both yelling at, and over top of me, out on the street, was her clear and contemptuous conveyance of her nil intention of listening to me, and her nil intention of acknowledging that there WERE clear delivery instructions on the package, which I was holding up and trying to show her)  that she needed to follow the delivery instructions . . . all as she continued to drown me out with obscenities and insults.


I finally broke: "Can't you read?!" And she yelled, "Right, you're getting carded!!"  (Whatever that may mean, and who cares.)


So Mr Devon Buckingham, General Manager of New Zealand Couriers (whose only contact point, even after much research, appears to be an email address for a PR agency), at this stage I am left to wonder if this is a much broader corporate culture issue within your organisation. 


Please explain.


PS:   And may I make the point that your PR agency really has their work cut out for them, when you hire contractors like this one to be the "face of your brand".


PPS:  I'll also point out that I did endeavour to communicate with you before publishing this article, but the phone number I managed to find for said PR agency (given that you, yourself, are completely obscured from customer access) just kept going to a non-descript generic voicemail, stating something to the effect of:  "The person you are calling is on the phone."

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 21 April 2025
AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
Show More