My Submission Against the Gene Technology Bill: DEADLINE IS FEBRUARY 17 (Super-Tight, So They Can Ram It Through)

Here's the full text of my own submission . . . you can copy any part of it you wish, to help inform or formulate your own submission. (NB: Despite the rushed deadline Collins & Co in the 'hive have imposed, the process of making the submission is very easy.)

In addition to the commentary I will provide in this field form, I also wish for my published article - i.e. on my publication, 'The Customer & The Constituent', to form part of my submission: Gene Tech Bill 2024: Should We 'Follow the Money', As Usual?

The problem I personally have with this horrendous, unethical, and wide and irreversible-damage rendering proposed legislation is just about everything – from the fact that the Bill:

Abandons the precautionary principle;

Fails to mandate safety standards or ethical guidelines to prevent harm to humans, animals, or ecosystems (note specifically that there is no consideration of animal welfare or long-term ecological impacts);

Has NO labelling requirements (denying consumers and farmers the ability to make informed choices and thus violating the principle of consent);

Is a threat to non-GMO agriculture and horticulture (through the Bill’s prevention of councils’ right to declare GMO-free zones);

Will see the immediate loss of New Zealand’s “clean and green” reputation in our high-value export markets;

Will see unremediable contamination obviously and unavoidably occur on a broad and national scale . . .

and more. MUCH more . . . including that which concerns me most of all (as though all the preceding weren’t bad enough) i.e. that it runs roughshod over an individual’s bodily autonomy and all issues surrounding any form of consent.

This latter issue, therefore, is the one I will choose to focus on in my submission:

Bodily Autonomy and Public Consent: Mandatory Authorisations Based on Overseas Approvals

This Bill allows “mandatory medical activity authorisations” for gene technology-based medicines or therapies "that have been approved by two overseas regulators" - bypassing New Zealand’s own regulatory scrutiny and poses significant risks:

These authorisations remove the opportunity for New Zealand to independently assess the safety, efficacy, and appropriateness of these technologies for its unique population . . . and, also prevent every individual citizen conducting their own assessment based on their own needs, preferences, concerns, and uniqueness of biology.

Different populations and environments may respond differently to medical interventions – as does each and every individual. Without local trials and reviews, risks specific to New Zealanders may go undetected. And how, tell me, do you conduct safety trials for each and every individual’s own uniquenesses?

Have you learned absolutely nothing from the death, disabilities, and other forms of biological carnage that the Covid “vaccines” left in their wake – and that continue to do so, even to this day, AND that will continue to do so throughout the lives of many of those who took them – whether or not they have yet been adversely affected?

Is there no concern for this and for the horrendously broad scale of it, as well as for the complete unaccountability of those in the chain of both manufacture and decision-making that led to the impacts on these tens of thousands of individuals (and their families and their workplaces) in New Zealand?

There appears to be a convenient refusal by politicians and other vested interests to resolutely ignore these impacts or to learn any lessons whatsoever from the COVID-19 mRNA disaster:

Again, my key point in summary:

The COVID-19 mRNA gene therapy vaccines, fast-tracked under emergency authorisations and heavily influenced by overseas regulators, have caused significant harm in New Zealand.

Many thousands of Kiwis have reported injuries, and there have been substantial numbers of deaths linked to these substances.

This tragic experience underscores the critical need for rigorous local oversight and safety assessments before approving gene technology-based medical interventions – AND to NEVER, EVER FORCE these on ANY individual, INCLUDING not just without their permission but also, unfathomably (as the Bill intends in some applications and forms), without even their knowledge.

JUST IN: A new series of revelations about the known dangers of mRNA technology (even as the Covid shots were rolled out) from the United Kingdom's Covid Inquiry and the first U.S. state introduces a Bill to ban such mRNA experimentation on its populace.

< Older Post

Newer Post >

AI Usage in Marketing: 'Disclosure Responsible, Ethical & Expected'

by Jordan Kelly • 21 April 2025

AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'