NZ's Most Responsive MPs: Who Are They?
Jordan Kelly • 16 May 2024

What's the Primary Role of A Member of Parliament, If It's Not Representing His or Her Electorate's Constituents?

Some weeks back, I wrote to every Member of the New Zealand Parliament, interested to prompt their response with regard to how they treated approaches from their respective electorates' constituents, when a member of that electorate had an issue.


I'd done that because I'd been totally underwhelmed at the repeatedly beyond woeful performance of my own local Member of Parliament, Mike Butterick.


For the interest of The Customer NZ's readers - who are, of course, voters in this country - I'd like to provide the following commentary on the Ministers and MPs who took the time to acknowledge my email:


Prime Minister, the Right Hon. Christopher Luxon


Hats off to the PM's staff, and thank you to his "Correspondence Lead Advisor" Sonya Ford, who responded in less than two hours of receiving my email. 



The Right Hon. Chris Hipkins


(With my sincere apologies for my having inadvertently omitted this from my first publication of this article.)


The Leader of the Opposition's "Senior Correspondence Advisor", Dinah Okeby, was also prompt in her acknowledgement of my email and, meaningfully, included that she would pass on my comments to Minister Hipkins.


And that is what a good ministerial advisor should do. Well done.


MP for Christchurch Central, Duncan Webb


And hats off to Duncan Webb, whose responsiveness is exceeded only by his sense of humour.


Webb responded:  "That is outrageous – the last MP was much better."


That's an MP worth having as your elected representative.


MP for Te Tai Hauāuru, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer


Thank you to this MP's staff member, Tineka Kumeroa, who sent the polite, non-automated, same-day response to "acknowledge that this email has been received and noted".


MP for Kaikoura, Stuart Smith


Another MP worth actually having.


Smith answered my email personally. He wrote:


Dear Jordan,

 

Thank you for writing to me about The Customer NZ.

 

I endeavour to answer emails on the day that they are received and do my best to resolve constituent issues. That said, a resolution is not always possible.

 

This MP would likely get my vote purely for his responsiveness, if I lived in his electorate.


MP for Coromandel, Scott Simpson


Same-day acknowledgement from Simpson's "Community Engagement & Communications Advisor", Cherie Staples - although Cherie unfortunately didn't take the time to read the actual text of my email to realise that I wasn't in Simpson's electorate and simply sent a standard template response.


But at least it was a response, and not an auto-responder, or worse still, radio silence.


MP for Banks Peninsula, Vanessa Weenink


I'm not sure if this was recognition or a polite chastisement (I think it was the latter) . . . but at least she wrote it herself:


Hi Jordan,

 

It’s helpful when people do identify themselves as constituents of my electorate, because with the volume of emails some triage is required. I am focusing on my local issues and where I have a role to play.

 

Best wishes, Vanessa Weenink


MP for Otaki, Tim Costley


I was over the moon to get the following response . . . .


Hi Jordan,

 

Thank you for getting in touch.

 

I can’t comment on what my colleagues do but, in my electorate, I am passionate about helping the community in any way I can. I try to get out and visit as many people and places as I can in my electorate.

 

Kind regards, Tim Costley


. . . . but I crashed from a great height after I sent him a request for an interview (subject:  A Month In the Life of A Community-Responsive MP). and he completely ignored me!


Green Party, Co-Leader, Chlöe Swarbrick


While Swarbrick's response was in the form of an auto-responder, what impressed me was that the auto-responder included something no other politician's auto-responder had:  the direct email address of her executive assistant, and an invitation to email her if the matter was urgent.


I felt that showed a degree of caring and political responsibility that was worthy of note.


MP for Panmure–Ōtāhuhu, Jenny Salesa


Top marks to Salesa's "Senior MP Support" staff member, Michael Clatworthy, who took exactly 25 minutes to respond, personally:


Morning Jordan

 

Thank you for emailing, I can confirm on behalf of Jenny that all electorate correspondence is acknowledged and responded to in a timely manner.

 

Ngā mihi, Michael Clatworthy


A great person to have on your team if you're a busy MP that cares about your constituents. MPs, take note if you're looking for a senior support staff member of that ilk. Very impressive.


MP for Rangitata, James Meager


And from another MP support staffer well worth any MP on the market for one, watching out for . . . a prompt, polite and useful response promising to take the action that she was capable of taking, as relevant to my email:


Hi Jordan

 

Just acknowledging your email and will make sure that James receives it.

 

Kind regards

 

Judy

 

Judy Cunningham

Team Coordinator

 

List MP, Damien O'Connor


Obviously a man that doesn't waste words, O'Connor took a moment to respond to me personally:


"Always tried."  (In response to my question as to whether he'd offer greater respect and communications performance than my local MP.)


Read Receipt Courtesies


The following MPs (or their staff members) at least had the professional courtesy to return the automated "read receipt" request I assigned to my email to them.


A small consideration, but one that - in my estimation - demonstrates a decent degree of professionalism:


Rt. Hon. Chris Hipkins, Laura Trask, Andy Foster, Rima Nakhle, Priyanca Radhakrishnan, Tracey McLellan, Hamish Campbell, Mark Cameron . . . and someone from Chloe Swarbrick's office actually read my email, in addition to my above mention, because I received the read receipt on my email to her, in addition. (A belated addition to this list is Celia Wade-Brown, whose read receipt came in some days later, and I missed it when initially collating responses.)


As For the Rest . . .


(With apologies to any Minister or Member of Parliament who did respond and whose response I have inadvertently missed) . . . the rest of the current New Zealand political set either ignored my email, or my email to their inbox generated the most useless, almost-universally-identical auto-responder.


If you've ever seen that (again, almost carbon copy auto-responder), I'll paraphrase the way it comes across to me:


"Yeah, look, would you mind buggering off. We get LOADS of emails from the likes of pesky constituents like you, and - unless you've got a speaking engagement offer of significant political value to me - not interested. Ta ta. Have a good day."

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 21 April 2025
AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
Show More