School Kids, Mobile Phones & Brain Health (Part 2 of 2)
Jordan Kelly • 20 May 2024

Digital Devices Akin to Giving Children 'A Cannabis Plant & A Bag of Fertiliser'

(Part 2 in A Two-Part Series by Guest Author, Lyn McLean, Founder & CEO of EMR Australia)


Did you know that the digital technology that’s so commonly used in education – at home and school, not to mention everywhere else – is having impacts on our children's neurological processes and interfering with their actual ability to learn?


These are the conclusions of Professor Tom Butler, from the University College in Cork, who conducted an extensive review of the latest research in neuroscience, cognitive psychology and education. 


Part One of this series looked at the effects of device use on students’ sleep, vision and attention.


In Part Two, we take a look at what Professor Butler has to say about the effects of digital technology on the brain and actual learning outcomes – and see his suggestions about what can be done to mitigate the risks.


Effects On the Brain 


Alarmingly, Butler says that using digital devices can negatively affect brain function.


As we’ve seen in Part One of this two-Part series, it can impair both memory and cognition. However, it can also affect brain chemistry itself, contributing to psychological problems and negatively affecting general well-being.


Multi-tasking on digital devices increases the production of cortisol (a stress hormone) and adrenaline (a fight-or-flight hormone).


"This is a potent chemical cocktail that can overstimulate a student’s brain, reduce clarity of thought, and produce muddled thinking," Butler says.


The distracting nature of technology appeals to the prefrontal cortex of the brain that is attracted to novelty and reward.


“We answer the phone, look up something on the internet, check our email, send an SMS . . . and each of these things tweaks the novelty-seeking, reward-seeking centres of the brain, causing a burst of endogenous opioids (no wonder it feels so good!), all to the detriment of our staying on task.”


Brain plasticity (adaptability) means that negative behaviours like these can physically rewire the brain’s circuitry, thus entrenching the behaviours and causing addiction.


Fifty Percent of Students Affected by 'Internet Addiction'


Internet addiction is a huge problem, with studies showing that up to fifty percent of students are affected.


Butler cites evidence showing that "pathological internet use" is linked with depression and ADHD.


Further, he says that "high levels of ST (Screen Time) is now considered an independent risk factor in heart disease, poor development outcomes among children, adult disease, and untimely death."


Learning Outcomes:  'The Benefits of Digital Technologies Are Minimal'


Digital technologies have been widely used in classrooms for many years. But where are the benefits?


Butler believes they are minimal:  "Digital technology applications may develop very narrow, non-transferable, cognitive and/or motor skills in children at the expense of more important reading, mathematical skills, interpersonal and problem-solving skills."


He reveals that many Big Tech executives (e.g. those from Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Intel) send their children to Waldorf Schools, where children are discouraged from using digital technology at home or school before the age of 12.


Professor Butler says that this alone should give educators pause for thought.


Akin to Giving Children 'A Cannabis Plant & A Bag of Fertiliser'


Even though educators often cite studies showing the advantages of digital technology for education, Butler says that many of those are deeply flawed or have not been peer-reviewed.


He holds the view that children under 12 should not be using screen-based technologies at school.


"Given what neuroscientists have discovered about the dysfunctional and addictive effects of screen-based applications on the human brain, providing children and adolescents with smartphones or tablets is akin to giving them a cannabis plant and a bag of fertiliser."


So What Should We Do?


He makes the following recommendations for parents and educators:


  •     Avoid the use of tablets and laptops both at home and at school.
  •     Use screen-based devices for no more than an hour each evening.
  •      Avoid the use of e-books.
  •     Where e-books must be used, use them with reflected (rather than LED) lighting.
  •     Use pen-and-paper in class.
  •     Educate students about the problems of digital technology.


In conclusion, parents and educators should think long and hard about the multiple ways in which digital technology, and its unnecessary, excessive and inappropriate use, are impairing the learning and well-being of our children and potentially compromising their futures.


Reference:  Butler, T. (2024, March 29). A Critical Review of Digital Technology in Education: A Pause for Thought in 2024. SocArXivhttps://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/5q8vg



Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 21 April 2025
AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
Show More