Seasoned Animal Control Inspector Offers Advice for Dog Owners If Your Precious Pooch Goes Missing
Jordan Kelly • 25 February 2025

Your 'Baby’s' Missing. You're Staring Down the Barrel of Your Worst Nightmare. What Do You Do?

(This is an advisory article on what to do, in what order to do it, and what not to do, in the event your worst nightmare becomes a reality, and your beloved dog goes missing. I know that only the devoted pet parents among my readers will have clicked on this article . . . so first, bear with me, while I relate my own horrifying experience . . . which includes all the things that should have been done, but weren’t. Further into the article, you’ll receive the promised frontline advice from a seasoned animal control officer - advice that will maximise your chances of getting your “baby” back – and as quickly and safely as possible.)


Suddenly realising your precious fur baby is missing, is one of the most terrifying moments in a dedicated, and otherwise highly responsible, pet parent’s life.


I never thought it would happen to me. Until the day it did. 


I had left my precious little Harry in the “care” of a seemingly “lovely” retired English couple here in Masterton, New Zealand, for an afternoon while I had a dental appointment in Wellington (our capital city, a four-hour round trip).


I had found this couple after advertising for occasional care for instances just like said dentist appointment, where it wasn’t appropriate to take him and where he couldn’t be left in a vehicle – not for that amount of time, and, of course, not ever, in the warmer months. 


I had visited the home and yard environments of a shortlist of potential carers, and this couple seemed to be the ideal candidates. Their own little dog had died just prior, and they said they wanted part-time canine company but without the full-time commitment. 


Returning back late that afternoon – armed with British brand-name biscuits and cakes from a UK specialty products store, as a gift of gratitude for "looking after" my precious Harry – I found not only that no “looking after” had been done . . . but far, far worse than that, here’s what I actually found:


As I approached the couple's open patio door, I saw both of them sitting watching television. They barely looked up. As my eyes scoured around their lounge for Harry, they finally looked up at me, each with a scowl on their face. 


I thought they were playing some silly trick, and so I said, “OK, where is he?”


Harry Was GONE


It was at the moment of their unconcerned response that I realised the awful truth:  Harry was GONE.


They had no idea where. They had no idea when. And they had done NOTHING about it! (Except to claim that “we’ve been driving around looking for him” . . . which they certainly weren’t doing when my arrival had interrupted their TV-watching.)


Fear, terror and complete confusion took over in equal proportions – and at a scale I had never experienced before in my life. To the point where, in retrospect, I don’t even know what happened to the armful of British goodies I came laden with to their door. I assume I must have just dropped them on the patio. 


What I DO remember is – at the moment of realisation that this wasn’t just some silly, or cruel, joke, and that I was in a completely unfamiliar geographic territory (having moved to Masterton only weeks earlier) - letting out a blood-curdling scream, which met with chastisement from the couple, but still nil concern for Harry's whereabouts. 


When Neighbours Care, It Makes A World of Difference


A young couple in the neighboring house rushed out to investigate with great concern, and immediately set about searching their own property (something the “lovely English couple” had had who knows how many hours to have done).


While they were searching their yard, I then did the only thing my completely unprepared and not clearly thinking brain could do: Run up and down the street screaming “Harry, Harry” at the top of my lungs. 


A trio of several wonderful, and much clearer-thinking, retired ladies came running out of a house and coaxed me inside, whereby one of them got on her mobile phone to the local Council, one of them got on the local town Facebook page, and the other was trying to get hold of an IT guy who had taken my own mobile phone to attend to an issue with it, had not yet returned it, and who appeared in no particular hurry to answer it. 


One of the women decided to brave going across to the unconcerned English couple’s house to ask for some indication of what time (during the full afternoon and thus far evening) they at least thought might have been his time of disappearance. They had no idea, of course . . . despite the fact that their stated intention for him was to have had him in their lounge with them all day.


Just as I was on the verge of completely losing my mind and getting back into my vehicle to drive around the streets in search of him, a woman who was now talking with the young neighbours of the “lovely English couple”, called out to me, “Have you lost a little white dog called Harry?” (Thankfully, the “lovely English couple” hadn’t taken off Harry’s harness, to which was attached his name tag, my address, and his Council ID tag.)


Thank God (Literally) for A Happy Ending


To bring the story to a gratefully happy and successful ending: 


The woman’s daughter had seen Harry sitting in the middle of the road outside her (the daughter’s) son’s daycare centre earlier in the afternoon.


As she approached him, Harry had scarpered. But the quick-witted and quick-moving young woman managed to get herself and her young child into her car while not losing sight of him. She drove after him, before alighting and running after him into someone’s property. Said property owner had cornered him, handed him to her, whereafter she’d embarked on a search for me . . . all while I was searching for Harry. 


How did her mother know to go knocking on the young couple’s door? Because the young woman had taken a photo of Harry, uploaded it to the local Facebook community page, and some sharp-eyed resident had linked their own sighting of Harry earlier in the day to the “lovely English couple” . . . whereupon the young woman had sent her Mum door-knocking in the surrounding area. 


I have no words to express the depth of gratitude I feel to that young woman, and to her mother. The emotional rollercoaster of that hour or so, and the trauma of the memory of the initial terrifying moment, are something only another similarly devoted pet parent could comprehend. 


I wanted to tell this story – and to tell it in detail – in order to impress upon readers just how important it is to be diligent to either avoid such a circumstance, or to be appraised of what steps to take, and in what order, to minimise the odds of the worst outcome and maximise the chances of the best.


Intuitive Reactions vs Counterintuitive (but More Strategic) Practicalities


Who better to tell a doggie mamma or a doggie pappa exactly what steps to take and in what order, than an animal control inspector of 27 years’ experience “on the beat”?


Gordon Crawley is the “Team Leader of Animal & Bylaw Services” for Masterton District Council. He presides over a small team of three in the animal control section of his overall department. He, however, is the main “feet on the street” . . . or, rather, the guy driving around on patrol and taking care of most of the “hands on” duties.


Says Crawley:


“When a dog owner first realises their pet is missing, it’s an incredibly stressful moment, and people go into high levels of distress,” he says.


“Their mind is spinning: Is it lost, is it stolen, whose fault is it . . . ?


“As hard as it is, the key is DON’T PANIC. This is a moment when you need to both think and communicate clearly, if you are to enhance your chances of getting your dog back. 


“Your natural reaction will almost always be to go out and start looking for your dog. But, in fact, (speaking from the perspective of the New Zealand situation, at least), the very first thing you should do is let your local Council know.


“Because what might have (and often, has) happened, is that your dog got out four hours before you realised his or her disappearance, and we might well have it safely in the Council animal shelter. And all the while you are in high stress mode running around the streets looking for him or her.


“There’s an after-hours or emergency option on the outgoing voicemail options of most local councils’ main phone number. Don’t delay in using it. It doesn’t matter what time of the night it is. After hours call centre staff will take down the details of your situation, and the animal control team will be notified as soon as they come online first thing in the morning. 


“We’ll either have the dog (assuming you give us a sufficiently detailed and workable description), or we’ll convey the details to the appropriate team member/s at that time.”


Crawley says that while the Council’s animal control personnel don’t go driving around looking for a lost dog, if they are aware of a missing dog, the details they’ve been given will help them keep a firm eye on the area while on general patrol – which they often are, for example, in certain areas known to be problem territory.


Council is the First, but Only the First, Port of Call


After calling your local Council, the inspector says, your next move should be to get photos of your dog and a detailed description of him or her, on your local community’s social media pages (or that of the local area in which he or she was lost). Every local community has a Facebook page or something of that ilk, he says. (Indeed, that was the catalyst that led to Harry’s return.)


“Many, if not most, dogs get returned through this route, before we even get involved,” says Crawley. “Community social media pages are incredibly powerful. Don’t under-estimate them. People are always on those pages doing something.”


If your dog goes missing locally, go and knock on neighbours’ doors, he advises.


“I’d be inclined to visit neighboring properties up to seven or eight doors away in all directions, including off of side roads.”


Detail, Detail, Detail


The key here, he says, is to give a highly detailed description


Not just breed, but other identifiers, primarily, colour and secondary markings e.g. brown ears, brown dots above the eyes, colour of collar, and, of course, the name the dog answers to.


Crawley says the degree of detail regarding the dog’s physical appearance is especially important in the case of mixed breeds and the new “hybrid” breeds.


“Labradoodles, by way of an example, and most of these new, emerging hybrid dog breeds don’t put any specific picture even in my mind, even as a seasoned dog control officer, so you have to consider how little the name of some new type of breed would mean to the average householder.


“I know all the basic breeds – fox terrier, alsatian, labrador, heading dogs, all the standards, of course, and most people do. But when it comes to mixtures of different breeds or these new hybrids – I have no idea what I’m looking out for, let alone the average resident trying to work out what mixed breeds or the increasing number of new mixed breeds look like. 


Having a very detailed description of what your dog looks like is critical. Including when you ring your Council pound – for the same reason.”


Put It In Print


My own suggestion in this regard, would be that – if your pet hasn’t been found after doing all the above and your first round of door-knocking, then - print out a clear photo of your pet, with the above level of detail in easy-to-read wording and print size.


Do a second door-knock exercise, delivering this notice in the form of (either A4 or A5) flyers around your neighbourhood, or the neighbourhood where he or she went missing (and also your own, if it’s a reasonable assumption that they could have tried to make their own way home).


Do that drop at least within the inspector's full recommended radius. 


An actual piece of tangible paper with your dog’s description greatly increases the sets of eyes and ears you’ll potentially have on the case. When you do a verbal version of the door-knock, you’re talking to one person at the door, but later on, that householder's whole family comes home – and hopefully, sees your flyer.


A No-Brainer but It Doesn’t Go Without Saying


Back to the animal control inspector:


“I can’t stress enough how critically important it is to make sure your dog’s registration is up to date, and to ensure that it is microchipped. That massively increases your chances of getting your dog back.”


Also on the note of the obvious, but worthy of a big and regular reminder:


“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure,” says Crawley. “Make sure your property is properly secure; fully dog-safe. 


“Good fencing has no gaps. And always make sure people shut gates. It’s very advisable to have a clearly visible ‘PLEASE SHUT THE GATE’ sign.


“And put this in the delivery instructions when you order anything by courier.”

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 21 April 2025
AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
Show More