Small Things That Make A Massive Impact On Customer Goodwill
Jordan Kelly • 25 July 2024

Retail Store Owners, Managers & Franchisees:  When Your Employees Do Important Little Things Like This, Do You Notice?

Earlier this week, at around 7pm, I made a visit to Bunnings' Petone store. I love Bunnings - for one simple reason, they're dog-friendly - and I always take my little dog with me whenever I go to Wellington.


On that note, I had him in one arm at the check-out as I tried - unsuccessfully - to juggle him, my purchases and the swiping of my EFTPOS card.


The EFTPOS card hit the floor, and before I could even commence my awkward descent to retrieve it, the most-awesome young check-out operator had sprinted around from the till area, and had it in hand.


Like, before you could say, "Shouldn't you be at the Paris Olympics?"


(NB:  Said check-out operator's name is Karen Marisol, disclosed with her permission.)


When It Comes to Customer Service, There's No Such Thing As 'Too Small' An Act of Kindness or Goodwill


As I've pointed out in my other articles congratulating an outlet or a customer service operative for some seemingly very small act of efficiency, quick-thinking, kindness or other brand of customer-focused action:  There's no such thing as too small, when it comes to the engendering of goodwill by a store or any other type of service operation.


Advertisers and marketers go on about "brand awareness" and "brand reputation". Well, I think customer experience is at the heart of how a customer feels about your brand. And, as is pointed out in an earlier article on The Customer, almost everyone in a company - or even associated with it - is either hurting or helping a brand.


So, in terms of customer experience, I'd like to make two specific points:


1)  Customer experience is cumulative. It's the sum total of little (or big) things the floor staff do for you when you're in that store that add up quickly, to equal your feeling about that store and the broader brand it represents.


2)  Directly related to (1), is that - and it can be unfortunate - it takes a lesser number of negative experiences to undo the positive feelings a customer has from the total of their previous positive experiences.


The point is, every single act of proficiency, politeness, kindness or goodwill counts towards the totality of your "brand image" in a customer's mind, and their feelings towards your outlet . . . and whether they continue to ring your till willingly and frequently, or only when absolutely necessary, if at all.


So if you're in charge of customer service in your outlet or for your brand, you really should notice the little acts of goodwill performed by your staff. You should actively encourage them. And you should hold them up as an example for your entire team.


No matter how small. Because that's the whole point.


UPDATE


To exemplify my point (2) above: 


I wanted the check-out operator and brand champion cited in this article, to know of its publication, so I rang Bunnings Petone to ask for the store manager, with the intention of emailing same. I waited on hold for nine minutes. Doesn't sound like a lot, but a caller can get a lot done in nine minutes, if they really want to . . . and a whole lot more than they can, sitting on indefinite hold.


But hey, it was 5pm and probably Bunnings' rush hour, so let's extend goodwill from the customers' end, too.


Here, though, is what really trashed the whole feeling of goodwill for me:   The on-hold outgoing recording featured some really offensive message every 15 or 20 seconds. It repeatedly warns that "aggressive, threatening (and some additional form of bad) behaviour" will have consequences.


There was only so many times I needed to be predictively accused of such oncomely conduct before my Bunnings warm and fuzzies started to really wear off. And the fact that the female voice recording the message was employing the tactic of smiling when speaking to try to sound less offensive, doesn't work. Not after listening to it something like 20 times in the space of less than 10 minutes.


My question to management is this:  Is such a significant proportion of your customer base such a bunch of thugs and degenerates that you need to absolutely hammer every caller with this highly offensive message . . . to the point of us all being able to recite it back to ourselves in our sleep?


The other option would be to organise your personnel so that you don't leave callers on hold for so long. Certainly, I would observe that both the staff members I spoke to on the way to eventually obtaining the required email address, sounded rushed to the point of brusque when they did answer. Which is actually quite unnerving for the customer on the other end.


So that's how easy it is to undo the "good".

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 21 April 2025
AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
Show More