There's TradeMe Sellers, and There's TradeMe Sellers
Jordan Kelly • 8 July 2024

A Well-Deserved Shout-out for Integrity & Attention to Detail

You find all degrees of integrity in the vast range of sellers on TradeMe . . . from great integrity all the way through to absolutely none.


But it's rare to encounter one with what you could justifiably describe as having "phenomenal integrity".


When I bought six items recently (from five different sellers), I came across two that qualified for that rarest of descriptors.


One was a used electronics seller. The sort of category where "you pays ya money and ya takes ya chances". However, I was after a very specific item . . . a little "ghetto blaster" exactly the same as that which I already had. There's a reason I wanted this particular, well-outdated little unit, and I was surprised not only to find one in this seller's catalogue, but two, and they looked to be in excellent condition. They were also priced reasonably.


A few questions sent to the seller - a marc-electrix - brought a lightning fast reply, and also a favorable response to my request for a discount if I purchased both units. (I knew my chances of finding these very special little units ever again, let alone in such a genuinely as-new condition, was low.)


'Please Don't Use NZ Post Couriers'


So that was good, but it's the next display of integrity that was truly outstanding. If you've read the article about my recent series of experiences with New Zealand Post's courier "service", you'll understand how non-negotiable it was for the seller to agree NOT, under any circumstances, to entrust the transport of these very delicate units to NZ Post Couriers.


It was no issue for the seller. He was very obliging. But what was truly impressive was the immense amount of care, integrity and professionalism (to say nothing of time and proper professional electronic packing materials) that went into his preparation of the package containing the two units. It was the sort of packaging (both in terms of materials and of effort) that you'd expect if you had bought a high-end electronic item from a "big box" (or other commercial) retailer . . . hardly for a couple of small, 15-year-old ghetto blasters.


From the verbatim, huge-type delivery instructions and the multiple "VERY FRAGILE" signs all over the box, to the knock-proof foam frames and the individual special-materials wrapping of every piece associated with each item, it must have taken him some considerable time to prepare for transport. And, I dare say, it possibly also cost him more than he charged me for the actual couriering thereof. 


And I'll also make mention of the fact that the two units were so freshly and pristine-cleaned that, aside from the datedness of the models, they could have held their own on a retail shelf today.


So, marc_electrix, I wish you every continued success with your TradeMe business. You truly deserve it. 


Integrity Plus


On to the next seller. A very different product and a very different experience . . . but a high-integrity seller, all the same. 


In this instance, I bought a free-standing, old-style wardrobe. Except that, actually, I didn't . . . Upon moving the wardrobe away from her wall to prepare it for transport, the seller was horrified to find evidence of borer in the back of it.


I had, however, already paid. Including for her to personally transport it from her region down to mine.


So she got in her vehicle, drove a 3-hour (or more) round trip, to refund my money, in cash, in person . . . and brought with her two bags of fresh organic fruit and vegetables grown on her own property by way of apology for the disappointment she felt she had caused me.


Now, that's integrity.


The other three items I purchased were all clothing. Heading into a Wairarapa winter, it was time to bundle up with a few big, oversized jumpers and/or a nice warm, stylish jacket to top off a pair of jeans.


One seller's gorgeous long mulberry dress-style jumper was just as described on the tin, if not even a little better. Further, it arrived folded respectfully, in a courier bag of a size sufficient to allow it to be packed nice and flat.


And Now to the Scumbag End of the Seller Spectrum


The two other sellers . . . what can I say? Not much. Cretins, the pair.


One advertised what looked like a bloke's very classy, up-market label jersey as "OS" (as in, Over-Sized) and crowed that it "covers your bum".


The other advertised a very stylish-looking faux-fur-lined, khaki bomber jacket . . . and she advertised it as a "Size 12".


The bloke's top-end label jersey arrived, and sure, it might have "covered your bum". If you were a BLOODY DWARF. And, as for "OS" (outsized), I'm a 12 with a reasonably svelte figure, and if THAT was "outsized", I'm a bloody monkey's uncle. It would hardly have been "outsized" even for a boy, let alone a man. Oh, and the seller turned out not to be a male (as had been my impression when purchasing), but a sheila, who took exception to the unhappy feedback I left on her TradeMe account (regarding the purchase I'd just made from her, that would find its next home at an op shop instead of in my wardrobe).


And the bomber jacket. Oh, the bomber jacket, the arrival of which I had awaited with such anticipation. Let's just say that, if I was a 10-year-old girl it might have fitted me nicely. Or perhaps an eight-year-old. It was tiny. It certainly was NOT the adult's "Size 12" it was advertised as. But whatever size it actually was will never be known, because the seller had carefully and totally cut out the label from the back of its collar.


In both of the above instances, the sellers had crumpled up and shoehorned the garments into the smallest possible plastic courier envelope they could. In the case of the bomber jacket, it must have been pushed in by foot. Truly a remarkable feat.


I hazard a guess that both sellers make further profit on the "shipping" fees they charge.


It's also my guess that they probably scour op shops and re-sell their booty on TradeMe, taking photos of their finds from ambiguous angles. I won't buy any more clothes from TradeMe after these experiences . . . which unfairly penalises sellers like the one who sold me the lovely mulberry jersey, of course. But taking a garment I've just paid good money for (plus "shipping") straight down to the nearest op shop without getting one wear out of it, is not my idea of "recycling".

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 21 April 2025
AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
Show More