If You Want Your Story Published Here, Don't Do This . . .
Jordan Kelly • 17 September 2024

To Whom It Frigging Concerns (You Know Who You Are & Who You Might Be)

For anyone who might, at any time, wish to contact me - as others have - and suggest or request coverage, here's a heads-up in case you're part of that percentile of society that treats others like total shit:


Although, yes, I'm a real journalist, I also operate The Customer & The Constituent entirely as a "hobby".


Meaning, no-one pays me to do it and I don't make any money out of it.


The relevance?


When someone asks me to provide coverage of their achievement, topic or whatever - and you treat me like a disposable paper cup - it annoys me even more than it would if I were, say, a newspaper or television journalist working for a media enterprise and receiving a fortnightly pay cheque. They're on someone else's dime (whereas I'm not on any at all).


So here are some specific (as in, actually happened) examples of how I don't like to be treated.


I don't appreciate it when:


  • Someone emails me, drawing my attention to an item of mainstream media coverage of which their family member was the subject, offers me the exclusive opportunity to publish photographic evidence of an establishment's extremely poor conduct (because the photographs in question were too explosive for the media outlet to publish) . . . but then simply "gets busy" and doesn't bother to tell me they won't be answering my phone when I call to keep the arrangement they made with me.


  • The owner of a very interesting art-based business, keen to be the subject of a Special Feature, emails me a phone number and a request to call . . . and I call immediately upon receipt of the email, but their phone doesn't answer. I email back, and the email is never answered. A week or so later, another email rocks in saying how busy they had become (like, in the five minutes between my receipt of their email asking me to call, and my doing so) and asking me to call again. I call again and the whole process repeats itself. Several weeks later, another email arrives asking me to call again.


       Try not to be a moron. I mean, at least try.


  • The Parliamentarian who wants to work with me on ongoing weekly articles in a Special Feature Series covering her area of portfolio interest . . . then, after the first one, allows me to arrange my entire weekend around her Sunday afternoon availability, only to "forget" the second arrangement. And who, regarding subsequent arrangements, would copy me in on a last-minute email to her assistant, to reschedule for another specific day and time, on which she assumed I would have nothing better to do than to be sitting by the phone waiting for her to call at this, yet another rescheduled time of her exclusive convenience.


  • An interviewee (with whom I wanted to have a pre-publication fact-checking phone call) tells me to call him at 4pm . . . and I call three times within a 20-minute window surrounding 4pm, and no calls are answered. He finally answers and tells me he was in some impromptu meeting that was more important than the call he had asked me to make to him. As if that isn't insulting enough, he offers no explanation as to why, when he exited said meeting, he couldn't have returned the call that, again, he asked me to make.


So, RESPECT, OK?

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 21 April 2025
AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
Show More