A Complaint Well-Handled Is A Customer Retained & Goodwill Preserved
Jordan Kelly • 7 January 2025

A Welcome Opportunity to Congratulate An Executive On A Complaint (Well) Handled

It gives me great pleasure to provide (belated) commentary on a customer complaint handled effectively, promptly, professionally, and all-round brilliantly well.


My apologies, Dan Pitt, long-serving Lower North Island Area Manager for New Zealand Couriers, that I didn't do as I promised and publish this commentary in early December when I gave my undertaking to do so . . . albeit, to be clear, you had not taken your impressive corrective actions with any intention or expectation that I would.


Here I am, though, finally getting around to keeping my own word. I wasn't about to let slide my determination to illustrate an important point:  That a customer complaint - no matter how serious, and unless it is reflective of wholesale systemic malfunction - can almost always be converted into a positive outcome, if handled with genuine concern, integrity, and an action-based approach towards resolution. (And preferably also, used as an opportunity for broader-based systems and/or attitudinal improvement.)


Resurrecting A Bad Situation & Doing the Brand Proud


On all the above counts, New Zealand Couriers' Dan Pitt did his brand proud. Which is just as well, because there are / were some pretty awful characters at lower levels in the organisation that appeared intent on doing as much damage to the brand as possible.


I won't repeat the story; readers can review it here. Suffice to say, that it involved a reasonably new and very lazy, abusive, recalcitrant, brand-embarrassing contracted courier.


Similarly, I won't go into the details of how this regional manager dealt with the courier in question. What I will go into is his admirable overall modus operandi with regard to how he handled my complaint.


The timely, logical, methodical and high-integrity manner in which he addressed, and worked through, the case, were in fact very similar to another review I provided to my readers some months back i.e. the exemplary approach of the Chief Executive of a private hospital group.


In Summary:


  • Mr Pitt contacted me immediately my emailed communications made their way down the line from the national call centre (who had been a total joke, or rather, had enjoyed trying to make a joke of ME), taking full responsibility for all aspects of the situation (despite the fact that most were nothing to do with him), expressing unreserved apologies on behalf of the entire company, and telling me exactly what steps he would be taking and the exact dates on which he would be taking them.


  • Impressively, a key point of action was to drive personally from his regional office base in Palmerston North, to the company's Masterton depot, to personally confront the courier in question (made even more impressive if you knew the huge geographic territory he manages).


  • Immediately the above actions were taken, he phoned me again, to report that these had indeed been taken. Albeit he did not disclose (and I did not want him to) the full suite of disciplinary measures, certainly they had involved the reduction of the courier's geographic territory, based on keeping her as far away from me, my neighbours, and my street, as possible.


In all, several phone calls were had between he and I, as he worked through this process. On each occasion, he again offered his unreserved apologies on behalf of the entire organisation.


When A Good Manager Gets Let Down by Someone Who Was Given A Real, And Undeserved, Opportunity


It wasn't too long into the above process that I started to feel very, very badly for this particularly loyal and extremely genuine senior manager.


He confided in me his embarrassment that it had, in fact, been himself who had interviewed and appointed this total disappointment of a contractor. I could hear the shame and regret in his voice, and it pained me to know that he had taken the matter so personally.


In closing, if that horrible, undeserving contracted courier is, by chance, reading this follow-up article, I hope you take at least a few minutes to reflect on the humiliation you caused a good manager, who gave you a real chance in an iconic modern-day Kiwi company.


If you yourself had even a small fraction of his level of integrity, you'd re-channel some of your own pity time regarding your reduced income, towards the grief you caused hm and the shame you brought to the New Zealand Couriers brand . . . and so very publicly, too.


Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 21 April 2025
AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
Show More