Two 'Gold Standard' Retail Personnel . . . And the Difference It Makes to A Customer
Jordan Kelly • 13 January 2025

When Trainees Should Be the Trainers . . .

Does anyone share the experience of being served by some outstanding young example of a retail staffer-in-training  (or, at least, someone obviously, by age, in the very beginning stages of their career in that industry) and think:


"This person should be the one conducting the training, not the one wearing the trainee badge."


I've had that very visceral reaction at least twice in recent weeks.


The first - and forgive me, Reace, because you're probably not still in trainer wheels - was at a Countdown (now Woolworths) store.


Supermarkets are the sort of place where you are hit in the face with the huge spectrum of difference in service standards and attitudes of personnel as you walk around the aisles. That is, if like me, you're always at-the-ready to ask a close-by staff member where to find a particular item, rather than spend several minutes or longer hunting for it yourself.


I was after a bottle of Thursday Island lavender essential oil. A product that, for some reason best known to whoever maps out Countdown's aisle and shelf planning, is always found in a completely different aisle than where it was last found.


The Right End of the Customer Service Attitudinal Spectrum


At hand was Reace. What follows is a much-shortened version of the efforts this staff member went to, to help me find an elusive product (and actually, a couple of others, too).


He's at the other end of the service attitudinal spectrum from the average staffer who would simply say, "Aisle 10" and, if you're lucky, thrust a pointer in the appropriate direction. Reace is the sort of example of customer service par excellence that walks you right to the product (or where it should be) - and then he goes hunting for it, if it's not there.


As he did with the lavender oil. Which was absolutely nowhere to be found - in that aisle or in any other.


Now, even most of the better supermarket staff would have considered their duty done at that point. But not Reace. No, for him it was just the beginning of assisting the customer. He went to the Service Desk and asked a colleague to confirm if the product was out of stock, or maybe somewhere completely different than before.


And the answer (after a lengthy and tenacious enquiry by Reace) was:  Countdown had decided not to stock the product any longer.


So, surely, that was the end of his obligation to the customer . . . But no. Not according to the extraordinarily high customer service standards to which this young bloke holds himself. His next move was to proactively confer with his colleague at the Service Desk as to the most likely options for finding the product in my locale - which involved the two of them in an online search and some practical and actionable information to assist me in continuing the search for said product.


All done with the most impeccable manners. You know, addressing a customer as "Madam", and the whole nine yards, in terms of all the signs of good breeding.


You're a winner, Reace.


When An Employee Who 'Goes the Extra Mile' Fosters A Loyal Customer Base


The female counterpart to the above example, would have to be a young woman by the name of Yvette (and her colleague, Jaydee) at a Repco outlet I visited this past Saturday.


The previous day, I'd phoned and described the specifics of a need I had related to preventing my little dog from flying between the gap between the seats in my vehicle, should I ever have to brake heavily. The bloke I spoke to wasn't particularly resourceful and the conversation was pretty unproductive.


So I asked a contact I had at Mitre 10 in Palmerston North . . . who directed me straight back to the local Repco that I'd already rung without result. But my helpful contact didn't just direct me back there on a whim . . . he provided the link to a Repco product that not only was exactly what I needed and identical to the imaginary product I had described to the Repco guy (who "couldn't think of anything"), it was a product that had the required function right there in the name:  "Vehicle Pet Barrier".


Even more remarkably, when I returned to that same local Repco, there was the very product right there, in stock, on the shelf! And it had been right there, at hand, when I had the conversation with the Repco guy who worked in the store.


Now . . . enter Jaydee who readily found and checked the suitability of the product, and then a most resourceful Yvette who (seeing clearly that I was no handywoman), popped all the components out of the packaging, right there (almost on closing time by the way, but it was no issue for her) and began expertly assembling them (a tricky exercise that she made look incredibly simple, albeit it wasn't anything of the sort).


Then the "Trainee" badge-wearing Yvette carried the unit out to my vehicle and proceeded to provide me with some particularly useful advice for whomever I would then take it to for final installation. 


When I commented on her outstanding level of service, her response was not to absorb the praise for herself, but rather, she immediately embarked on a glowing commentary on how much she loved her job.


A Wise Head on Young Shoulders


What she said next, though, was something I sincerely wish was the way in which every frontline retail worker everywhere, saw the first and foremost function of customer service:


"I don't see it as selling a product to a customer," said Yvette. "I see it as trying to find a solution to a problem, and the best solution I can come up with for them."


Talk about a wise old head on young shoulders. Just like Reace at Countdown, Yvette deserves to go a long way. And savvy is the manager or business owner that recognises the value each of them represents to any customer-facing enterprise.


Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 21 April 2025
AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
Show More