AA Road Service: When You Need It Most & The Right Hand Has No Idea What the Left Hand Is Doing
Jordan Kelly • 8 September 2024

From Insurance to Road Service, the NZ Automobile Association Is A Joke

 I almost can't be bothered writing this latest account of the AA, its customer service standards and its general performance. From their insurance call centre wallies to their road service call-out operators, they're a bloody joke. And I've written not one, but TWO earlier reviews to unfortunately prove it.


Last Tuesday night, my car was broken into. To say that I was in a stressful, vulnerable situation, late on a dark, wet and windy night, hours from my home, with no money (thanks to the thieves in which the Police had nil interest), no window in my driver's side, no mobile phone, and all alone with my little dog . . . that and more, would make "stressful" a study in the art of the understatement.


I used my wonderful new-found friend's mobile phone to call the AA for road service. The first operator tells me that they "only help with mechanical and structural issues", and that despite the fact I've been a subscriber my entire life, and to their Premium "service", he's happy to see me drive home across the RImutaka Ranges with no window, in the dead of night, in a galing wind, with rain pouring in,, and with my ass parked in a bed of broken glass.


However, I decided to try back and get a second operator. Glad I did. The first operator didn't know his ass from his elbow, apparently.. The second operator advised that of course they provide either glass replacement during business hours, or temporary glass replacement after hours. They wouldn't allow a service subscriber to get back on the road with no window! Nor, he said, would they allow me to sit in shards of broken glass, and he'd ensure the mechanic came out with something to clean it up with.


The former happened (i.e. a plastic window to get me home) but not the clean-up for safety assistance.


The other issue is, I was belatedly advised by another AA service subscriber and policy holder, that I should have been given a rental car to get home in. Of course, the AA never bothered to tell me that.


Unfortunately, This Useless Crowd Are Also My Insurers


Next, I try for better luck re the fact that they're also my insurer.


While on the phone to said insurance call centre, I realise that the spare keys to both my vehicles are in my wallet, as is my address book (showing my address), all of which are now in the possession of the thief or thieves.


I tell her so.. She tells me that "you can get new ones cut as part of your claim, so that will trigger your $500 excess then". I point out that the AA would be making a tidy profit from me, for the cutting of two keys.


I also try to clarify with her whether she means that that the cutting of two new keys should involve changing something in the ignition so that said thieves can't just rock up and drive both my vehicles away at their leisure.


'I SAID, GET A QUOTE!', the Call Centre Girl Instructs Me in Her Most Authoritarian 18-Year-Old Voice


But she - in all her youthful arrogance - is not about to let me speak. Mustering her best 18-year-old-sounding voice of authority, she berates me:  "I. SAID. GET. A. QUOTE." 


Being that I was STILL none the wiser as to precisely what I SHOULD be getting a quote for vs what she was instructing me to get a quote for, I suggested she might let me speak and listen to my need for clarification. But she wasn't about to do that. She simply hung up.


Someone at AA must have become aware of the abortive call, coupled with my previous two reviews of them on The Customer & The Constituent (here and here) . . . because several days later, they swung into damage control and I received a call from someone who organised the collection of my vehicle by the glass repairer and its prompt return. (I actually haven't stepped outside yet to check the work and the nature of the replacement glass, but will be doing so tomorrow. Watch this space, if necessary.)



Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 21 April 2025
AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
Show More