Hey, Evolution Healthcare: Unreliability, No Communication & Smart-Ass Rudeness Has NO Place in the Health Care Sector
Jordan Kelly • 12 September 2024

Wellington's Bowen Hospital Management & Evolution Healthcare, Be Ashamed. Be VERY Ashamed.

Early last week, I was done a lovely favour by someone at Bowen Private Hospital in Wellington. I wanted to express my gratitude in the form of some yummy morning tea delivery which, a couple of days later, I endeavored to go about arranging.


I had noted, while I was on site, exterior signage that seemed to indicate the existence of a cafe. The only phone number I could find for said cafe, however, was on a Facebook page. But upon dialing, it gave out a "no such number" tone.


So I called the hospital's reception. I gave them the detailed reason behind my desire to figure out what the situation was regarding the cafe.


Chain of Incongruent Communications


The receptionist advised me that the cafe was now integrated into the hospital's general kitchen operation. (Now, YES, that sounded a bit strange to me, but do remember, as you read on, that this is exactly what I was TOLD by said receptionist.)


I was duly put through to the kitchen and spoke to a friendly chap (whose name I was given) whom I believed to head up the hospital's kitchen operation. I began by checking that the understanding given to me by the receptionist was correct. He confirmed that indeed it was, and added further commentary.


I thus proceeded with my request, being:  Could he please organise a delivery of some delicious morning tea for the relevant staff members? Not only was this possible, but he was gracious in his description of what he would deliver, since he appeared to know the relevant staff and their preferences.


He was to make the delivery either that morning, or - if he found they'd already had their morning tea - the following morning. He told me the very reasonable price, and I offered to do a bank transfer while he was on the phone. He said that, no, the hospital had to send me an invoice. I duly provided my email address to enable same.


One Week Later . . .


Now almost a week later with no invoice and no indication from the intended recipients of my intended gesture that the brief had been executed, I rang the hospital's reception. I gave the largely uninterested receptionist an explanation of the issue, and she put me back to the kitchen, telling me the name of the head of kitchen who was on duty that day, in place of the previous staff member I had actually made the arrangement with.


And that's where things got really. bloody. shameful, Bowen Hospital management, and I hope you're reading this even. if. you. couldn't. give. a. shit.


So this other "head of kitchen", whose name I'd been given, was the one who answered. And what a horrid, rude, intentionally cloth-eared, misogynistic young character he was - one of those whereby it's just as well he doesn't have an actual public-facing role.


Who Gave (Intentionally Cloth-Eared) Hospital Staff the Authority to Chastise A Member of the Public, Anyway?


I explained yet again the reason for the call, and (without allowing me to even get close to a conclusion) he launched into an unbridled, smart-ass chastisement of me for my misunderstanding (refusing to acknowledge that it was a case of my having been misinformed by his own colleagues) of the tie-up between the cafe and the hospital. And I DO mean, it was a chastisement. And clearly, a very misplaced one.


He launched into a jolly good misogynistic telling off of me:  "We are a hospital kitchen. We are NOT set up to act like a cafe! etc etc". He refused to accept any part of my explanation that I'd not only been given the understanding I'd been given, but that I'd actually made an arrangement with his colleague, that said colleague had willingly and happily made.


I asked him (or I endeavored to) (a) why his counterpart would have told me he'd do what he'd undertaken to do, and (b) why someone wouldn't have had the decency to email or phone me (since I'd left both forms of contact) if some decision was thereafter made that they wouldn't do what they'd undertaken to do.


Misogyny Has No Place in Modern Society . . . But Least of All In A Hospital Setting


Then he coolly asked my name. I thought - for a mistaken moment in time - that he was actually going to be slightly respectful and look up some records somewhere regarding the conversation and the arrangement made with his counterpart.


More fool me.


He wanted my name, as I was about to discover, because he was about to up-level his smart-assed misogyny even further:


"Well, Ms Kelly (he began) ..... "


I don't remember the specific verbatim smart-assery that came after that, because frankly, I was incensed that a private (or any) hospital setting allowed their staff to speak to members of the public in such a manner, and certainly in relation to an issue of their own non-performance.


So, Hi there, Mr Misogynist Smart-Ass Head of Kitchen on Thursday, September 12, 2024, at Wellington's Bowen Hospital . . . Here's the commentary I promised regarding your rudeness.


You may note, therefore, that I'm a woman of my word.


You may also note that despite the fact that you fully deserve me to include your name (which I know) in this article, I'll refrain from doing so, to allow you to reflect upon your sheer and totally misplaced smart-assedness and whether or not you are really doing anything positive for the Bowen Hospital brand or the brand of its operating entity, Evolution Healthcare.


Update:


So, this is the update you have when you're not having an update.


I thought I would call Bowen Hospital back and let the hospital or duty manager know of the existence of this commentary and provide them with the opportunity for comment (which I could include here).


I asked the receptionist for the name of the hospital's Duty Manager. "Mary", she told me - offering to put me through.


"Mary" - for whom English sounded like a decidedly second language - answers, sounding as though I had roused her from a deep sleep. Mary tells me she is not the duty manager. Someone else is.


I tell Mary why I'm calling and ask for an email address to which to send the link to this story. She wouldn't give me one. She instead offered to take my phone number and have the real duty manager call me back, which she said would be "very shortly". As in, "definitely" this afternoon.


Well, the real duty manager has, of course, never called. And, I'm guessing, never will.


Bringing Back Very Bad Old Memories . . .


So, I decided to see if Evolution Healthcare, its ownership entity, had an email address online. It doesn't. But some of what I discovered are a dozen other "healthcare" operations it owns, do have an email address available. I emailed a link to each of them, asking them to pass on the link to the corporate Evolution Healthcare entity, since it doesn't have an email address available. We'll see what happens in that regard. That's six other recipients (including their "media team" that now have the opportunity to acknowledge or maybe, who knows, even bother to respond) to my feedback.


What really concerned me by way of a discovery in that process, though, is that this "Evolution Healthcare" owns BOTH of the private hospitals in Wellington. Which is HORRIFYING to me, because the other private hospital is the Wakefield private hospital in Newtown.


I have had four surgeries in my adult life. I really only needed two. (And, possibly even, only ever one, but it was of course profitable for certain other parties to convince me otherwise.) Surgeries two and three (which had to be conducted at a public hospital) were corrective measures, due to the horrendously botched nature of the first surgery at this Wakefield horror establishment. I had, in fact, ended up ambulanced from there to the intensive care unit in the public hospital after the mess I came out of Wakefield's operating theatre in.


The final surgery (also at the Wakefield private hospital House of Horror) was one I equally would rather have forgotten - for multiple reasons, including staff incompetence and hospital management dishonesty when I reported one of the at least two instances of it.


But I should have known better before I entered those damned doors for that last one. My best friend's father went in for heart surgery and departed in an undertaker's van.


Update:


OK. So this is really concerning.


There is NO phone number and NO email address for the corporate umbrella entity, Evolution Healthcare. I've been trawling their corporate website. There is NO way to contact anyone at the entity that owns all these downstream medical businesses.


Meaning:  If you were a patient at any of these subsidiaries, there appears to be NO WAY TO DIRECTLY ESCALATE a concern or a complaint up past the actual downstream business i.e. the subject of your concern or complaint.


Even when you click on the photos and titles of the "Leadership Team" . . . NOTHING.


The entire corporate operation and its website is without any semblance of a phone number or even an email address.


Well . . . THAT would give you great confidence, wouldn't it?


Seriously, people need to do a lot more research before they, literally, put their lives and the lives of their loved ones, in the unaccountable (and, regrettably, in my own personal experience, arrogant and incompetent) hands of this entity and its downstream enterprises.


Lest you leave the way my best friend's father left.



Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 21 April 2025
AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
Show More