This Reader's Experience - And Her Advice to Retailers - Is Well Worth Listening To
Jordan Kelly • 17 January 2025

Reader:  'Their Online Reviews Are As Bad As My Own Experience. Haven't They Seen Them? Don't They CARE?!'

I've just been contacted by a seasoned retailer who owns several businesses in the lower North Island.


Bev Saunders, a new Levin (in the Horowhenua) resident, wanted to tell me about an experience this week, that left her aghast at the revenue a particular business owner must be leaving on the table, by the "couldn't give a stuff", "sensationally poor attitude" of this large regional retail and "service" provider.


Since she has no idea whether the "service" person she encountered was the owner or an employee - and has no desire to have anything further to do with the business in order to find out - she's asked me to grant the operation the grace of not identifying it.


While Bev and her husband were still in the process of moving into their new house in the town, they discovered that the whole-of-house water filtration system was in need of urgent repair. As in, when some part of the system was activated (I won't bother trying to encapsulate the full technical explanation), an "explosion" of water was coming out of somewhere it shouldn't have been.


"The system was much more complex than anything we’d ever seen before," said Bev. "So I took multiple photos of the different points" i.e. at which a fault could have been the cause, and headed for a large, established business that obviously dealt in this type of product as part of its broader field of expertise.


Begging to Be Sold To


For clarity and context, it should at this point be noted, that Bev was entirely open to any solution that might be recommended: from a $50 widget and some advice as to how to fit it, to a multiple-thousand-dollar full replacement system, to simply a referral to someone else who could solve what was obviously an urgent problem.


"I walked in, said hi, and said, 'I’ve just moved into this house; can I show you the photos of this problem?'


"I then explained the problem as I showed him the photos. I tried to interest him in the fact that I'd gone as far as I could in identifying the source of the problem. But he was uninterested from the start.


"I tried to impress upon him how much I needed his advice, because I had a BIG problem.  Water was spurting everywhere.


"He just tried to flick me off by saying ‘I’ve got nothing in stock’ . . . But what did that even mean?


"I asked if his company could come and install some replacement system," says Bev. "But he was so uninterested that he just kept trying to flick me off in every possible way.


"His whole attitude made me feel like I was just a stupid woman who was purely an annoyance to him. He seemed to be actually mocking me. Like he had so many more important things to do than speak to me.


"I couldn’t get through to him, that I was open to, including paying the cost of, whatever he was willing to recommend."


'Just" A Woman. What Would She Know?' (BIG Mistake)


'I honestly felt like he was trying to communicate that I was a "mere' woman in a man’s world and not worthy of being taken seriously.


"You get that sometimes, don’t you? Some men seem to think that women just don’t have the ability to grasp concepts in a manual field. But I used to work at Plumbing World, so I’m not completely ignorant in that regard at all. 


"In the end, I just picked up my handbag and left. But as I was walking down the street, I’m trying to figure out:


  • "Did I come across as some loser with no money to pay for whatever solution he would have otherwise taken the time to recommend?


  • "Was it that he really just can’t relate to a female customer?


  • "Or is he not the shop owner and so he had no vested interest in whether or not the business gained a new customer . . . including even a highly profitable and even a lifetime one?


  • "Worse still, was he the business owner, and has no retail customer service skills whatsoever and no concern about it either?


"He literally could have sold me a whole new system – with as simple an effort as saying, 'I’m not sure, but these photos are all we need, so I’ll show (whoever) and get back to you with our recommendation – which might be to replace the system in its entirely' . . . which I had made clear I was perfectly open to."


Advice from A Seasoned Retailer (Bev Herself)


Bev's own businesses are in the FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods) sector. And she's aghast at how little regard the business in question appeared to have for:


- "The profitability of a regular (and probably long-term) customer, OR


- "The power of word-of-mouth – which works either way i.e. did a customer have a great experience or a crap experience with you?'"


"And if he’s
not  the owner, then he’s losing business and revenue for that owner. He needs education on how to look after a customer for the value they represent to the business. He needs to be taught to actually recognise that. He needs to be put through some course, at the very least. There are plenty of courses out there. He needs to be taught even just how to deal with the public." 


A Slew of Terrible Reviews


During our phone call, Bev was surfing the business’s reviews online. While they were "a real mixed bag", they were definitely weighted towards the negative. VERY negative . . . with several that were an echo of her own experience - and were, whether coincidental or not - by female customers.


Examples:


"I went in for a spa filter, knowing exactly what I needed, customer service is appalling, was treated like I knew nothing and claimed that I had the wrong filter, which I absolutely did not. WILL NOT BE BACK.”


“Appalling service. Would not recommend.”


“Unhelpful and unmotivated customer service.’


“Been waiting several weeks for them to come, not impressed."


So what does that tell a seasoned retail business owner like Bev Saunders?


"You need to weed out the thorns that are causing reviews like this. Fix them or fire them. This is an appalling set of reviews (even despite a few positive ones sprinkled in) to have live on the internet about a business.


“And the fact that there’s seemingly no concern by management about the fact that these terrible reviews are there, and that they just keep coming, is beyond comprehension."


As a case in point with regard to revenue left on the table by a business like this, Bev told me that - had she had even an acceptable experience with this business - she would have returned in the short-term, to investigate the purchase of the two-person spa pool that she and her husband would like to have installed in their new property.


Are you listening, Mr Business Owner? Are you calculating your lost profits?


Ripe for Acquisition or Competition  (A Lesson from Jordan)


I remember going to a small business seminar once, years ago, I think by the high-profile SME guru, Brad Sugars . . . not sure now.


But what I do clearly remember is one of his greatest lessons for success, which related to buying up and turning small operations to a profit. 


He had said:  "Find a business that’s doing well despite itself. If you walk in, and the customer service is terrible, but they seem to be very much surviving anyway . . . BUY THAT BUSINESS!"


And you can see it so obviously, once you've had that pointed out to you. You don't need to be a marketing professional like myself. Anyone can see it.


Acquire the business, turn its customer service around, and you’ll wipe its competition off the map, if it actually even has any, because maybe that’s been the only reason for its continued survival in the face of its poor attitude and standards.


Either way, poor customer service is, ultimately, the choice of a fool.

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 21 April 2025
AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
Show More